<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Street Photographer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetfetish.com/2009/06/06/the-street-photographer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetfetish.com/2009/06/06/the-street-photographer/</link>
	<description>current theme: &#34;winter time&#34; // ring of urban photographers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 06:59:47 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.streetfetish.com/2009/06/06/the-street-photographer/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 03:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetfetish.com/?p=170#comment-57</guid>
		<description>I think this shot could have been better if you had positioned yourself behind the two kids taking the picture, captured part of their camera and shoulders (blurry as the foreground) and then had the baby&#039;s face as the main focal point of the image. Or vice versa and shoot lower behind the baby&#039;s head and capture the kids taking the photo. My main point is that there is too much information in this shot, there is no focal point and some of it can be cropped to make it more dynamic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this shot could have been better if you had positioned yourself behind the two kids taking the picture, captured part of their camera and shoulders (blurry as the foreground) and then had the baby&#8217;s face as the main focal point of the image. Or vice versa and shoot lower behind the baby&#8217;s head and capture the kids taking the photo. My main point is that there is too much information in this shot, there is no focal point and some of it can be cropped to make it more dynamic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruud</title>
		<link>http://www.streetfetish.com/2009/06/06/the-street-photographer/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 10:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetfetish.com/?p=170#comment-48</guid>
		<description>I agree about the match with the theme of this month. Besides that I think the moment is good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree about the match with the theme of this month. Besides that I think the moment is good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward Osborn</title>
		<link>http://www.streetfetish.com/2009/06/06/the-street-photographer/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward Osborn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 00:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetfetish.com/?p=170#comment-47</guid>
		<description>This is a great capture. Most would have missed it. One to be proud of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great capture. Most would have missed it. One to be proud of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fokke Lingeman</title>
		<link>http://www.streetfetish.com/2009/06/06/the-street-photographer/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Fokke Lingeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 09:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetfetish.com/?p=170#comment-40</guid>
		<description>I agree with Jurian, nice photo. I especially like the tight way of how you framed it. I did have some trouble identifying this photo with the &quot;movement&quot; theme though, how do you guys see that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Jurian, nice photo. I especially like the tight way of how you framed it. I did have some trouble identifying this photo with the &#8220;movement&#8221; theme though, how do you guys see that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jurian van der Have</title>
		<link>http://www.streetfetish.com/2009/06/06/the-street-photographer/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Jurian van der Have</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 09:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetfetish.com/?p=170#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Only the movement theme did not match with this picture from my view..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only the movement theme did not match with this picture from my view..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jurian van der Have</title>
		<link>http://www.streetfetish.com/2009/06/06/the-street-photographer/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Jurian van der Have</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 09:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetfetish.com/?p=170#comment-38</guid>
		<description>I really do like this picture! It fits together: grayscale, depth, and the fascination on the kids their faces for the camera. Well done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really do like this picture! It fits together: grayscale, depth, and the fascination on the kids their faces for the camera. Well done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
